SEIF 7 (CONTINUED)

Continue

SEIF 7 (CONTINUED)



BOSIS NOT ON THE MAIN PART OF UTENSIL



If Muktza was placed on a secondary part of a utensil, but there was nothing on it's main part, the Trumas Hadeshen says that it's not Bosis and you may move the utensil. He brings a proof from the Gemara Shabbos 44b. If someone puts money on a wheel that is removed from the wagon, the wheel becomes Bosis to it. Tosfos explains that if the wheel would be attached to the wagon, the money on top of it would not make it… Continue

SEIF 7 (CONT.)



TO REMOVE THE STATUS OF A Bag THAT WAS DESIGNATED TO HOLD MONEY



The Rama says, that if you had a bag that was designated to hold money and you want to change it back to a regular bag so it won't be Muktza, it's not enough to say that he designates it to be a regular bag. He has to do some action to change the bag in order to designate it to a regular bag.



The Gra brings a Mishna in the twenty fifth Perek of Keilim as a Mekor for this. It says there, if… Continue

SEIF 7 (CONTINUED)



A BED THAT WAS DESIGNATED TO HOLD MONEY- PART THREE



The Tosfos Shabbos brings the Rashba's Shita that a utensil that doesn't perform a Malacha, but a Malacha is done on it (like a pot which doesn't cook the food per se, but rather you cook in it) is not a Kli Shemalachto L'Issur (a utensil which main use is forbidden.) He wants to say this is the reason why the Rif considers the bed permitted to move, since the bed doesn't do any Issur, rather the money is… Continue